Correlation between suspected diagnosis by Magnetic Resonance, and definitive diagnosis by Stereotactic-Guided biopsy in Mexico City between 2017 and 2021
Keywords:
biopsy, brain, lesions, magnetic resonance, neoplasm, stereotactic.Abstract
Objective: Stereotactic brain biopsy, which employs imaging techniques such as computed tomography, is an important tool not only for obtaining an accurate diagnosis but also for avoiding damage to vital structures.
Methods: We collected data through our computer-based system Comprehensive Hospital Administration System (CHAS) and the images through Synapse, an internet-based software in our medical center. Only one neurosurgeon performed all biopsy procedures, and all biopsy materials were evaluated by two pathologists.
Results: Our diagnostic performance was average for a total of 83.87 % compared to the greatest series resulting > 90 %, and 39 of them matched the magnetic resonance image with the histopathological diagnosis for a total of 62 %, which is considered low.
Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histopathologic diagnosis had a 74 % correlation, which is considered average. Histopathological diagnosis is entirely dependent on pathology specialists, which is why we need an initial guideline in this case, magnetic resonance.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
1. Shukla G, Alexander GS, Bakas S, Nikam R, Talekar K, Palmer JD, et al. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma: a review. Chinese Clinical Oncology. 2017 Aug;6(4):40–0
2.- Lopez WO, Cordeiro JG, Albicker U, Doostkam S, Nikkhah G, Kirch R, et al. Correlation of 18F-fluoroethyl tyrosine positron-emission tomography uptake values and histomorphological findings by stereotactic serial biopsy in newly diagnosed brain tumors using a refined software tool. OncoTargets and Therapy [Internet]. 2015 Dec [cited 2022 Jun 24];3803. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689263/
3.- Chinot OL, Macdonald DR, Abrey LE, Zahlmann G, Kerloëguen Y, Cloughesy TF. Response Assessment Criteria for Glioblastoma: Practical Adaptation and Implementation in Clinical Trials of Antiangiogenic Therapy. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2013 Mar 26;13(5).
4.- Teixeira MJ [UNESP, Fonoff ET [UNESP, Mandel M [UNESP, Alves HL [UNESP, Rosemberg S. Stereotactic biopsies of brain lesions. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria [Internet]. 2009 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Jun 24];74. Available from: https://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/212416
5.- Pope WB, Brandal G. Conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with high-grade glioma. The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2018 Sep;62(3)
6.-Furlanetti LL, Monaco BA, Cordeiro JG, Lopez WOC, Trippel M. Frame-based stereotactic neurosurgery in children under the age of seven: Freiburg University’s experience from 99 consecutive cases. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery [Internet]. 2015 Mar 1 [cited 2022 Jun 24];130:42–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25576884/
7.-Riche M, Amelot A, Peyre M, Capelle L, Carpentier A, Mathon B. Complications after frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy: a systematic review. Neurosurgical Review. 2020 Jan 4
8.- He L, He D, Qi Y, Zhou J, Yuan C, Chang H, et al. Stereotactic Biopsy for Brainstem Lesions: A Meta-analysis with Noncomparative Binary Data. Cancer Control [Internet]. 2021 Jan [cited 2022 Jun 24];28:107327482110598. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670786/
9.- Birski M, Furtak J, Krystkiewicz K, Birska J, Zielinska K, Sokal P, et al. Endoscopic versus stereotactic biopsies of intracranial lesions involving the ventricles. Neurosurgical Review. 2020 Aug 21;44(3):1721–7.
10.- Dellaretti M, Câmara BBA, Ferreira PHPB, da Silva Júnior JB, Arantes RME. Impact of histological diagnosis on the treatment of atypical brainstem lesions. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2020 Jul 6 [cited 2022 Jun 24];10(1). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338439/
